No smoking
Nov. 27th, 2012 09:06 amhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SfAxUpeVhCg
Many advertisements rely on triggering an emotional response to get a point across. Usually they try inciting happiness and positive feelings with their product or massage. However another angle is to incite fear or sadness to portray a message. In this old anti-smoking ad we can clearly see why they would use such an angle. Everyone knows smoking is bad for you so any add promoting it pretty much has no choice but to try to trigger a negative emotional response. Trying to use negative emotions however can backfire and make people completely dislike you’re ad. This particular ad is a good example of this. Many felt using a crying child to convey a message of abandonment was way too harsh. The ad people felt would only scare children not just of smoking but losing their parents in general. Also many people who were already stricken with illness that already have children do not deserve to feel guilty about not being there for their children. Despite the message getting across many people felt the commercial itself was much more out of line than the act of smoking itself. One other thing to end this post is many believe the child was not acting when he cried, but was actually being filmed while he believed his mother had actually left him in an airport.
Many advertisements rely on triggering an emotional response to get a point across. Usually they try inciting happiness and positive feelings with their product or massage. However another angle is to incite fear or sadness to portray a message. In this old anti-smoking ad we can clearly see why they would use such an angle. Everyone knows smoking is bad for you so any add promoting it pretty much has no choice but to try to trigger a negative emotional response. Trying to use negative emotions however can backfire and make people completely dislike you’re ad. This particular ad is a good example of this. Many felt using a crying child to convey a message of abandonment was way too harsh. The ad people felt would only scare children not just of smoking but losing their parents in general. Also many people who were already stricken with illness that already have children do not deserve to feel guilty about not being there for their children. Despite the message getting across many people felt the commercial itself was much more out of line than the act of smoking itself. One other thing to end this post is many believe the child was not acting when he cried, but was actually being filmed while he believed his mother had actually left him in an airport.